Restylane Contour vs Lyft: Understanding the Differences

Consumers seeking facial rejuvenation through dermal fillers often encounter the famous Restylane family of products. But choosing between Restylane Contour and Lyft, both targeting the cheeks and midface, can be challenging.

Restylane Contour and Lyft are hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers naturally found in the skin that provide volume and hydration. However, these Restylane options differ in their specific formulation and intended use. Deciding which best suits your needs depends on the degree of correction and the desired outcome.

This article will provide a clear breakdown of Restylane Contour and Lyft. We’ll explore their unique properties, ideal applications, and potential results. This comprehensive guide will empower you to achieve your dream facial contours.

Key Takeaways

• Restylane Contour improves the appearance of cheeks and keeps faces flexible. It adds just the right volume to the midface for a natural look.
• Restylane Lyft goes deeper under your skin to fix deep lines and folds, like the ones from your nose to your mouth. It gives a firm lift and holds up parts of the face that need it.
• Both fillers are safe but can cause some swelling, redness, or pain at first. Knowing their differences helps doctors pick the best one for each person’s face goals.
• Doctors have unique ways of putting these fillers in, which work best—each filler’s thickness changes.
• Looking at someone’s unique facial shape and what changes they want helps them decide between Restylane Contour and Lyft.

Introduction to Restylane Contour and Lyft Fillers

Facial contouring with dermal fillers like Restylane Contour and Lyft enhances the face. For these treatments, like the cheeks, hyaluronic acid adds volume where needed.

Dermal fillers like Restylane Contour and Lyft play a crucial role in facial contouring, transforming the approach to aesthetic enhancement. Medical professionals need to know what sets these two products apart. This knowledge ensures they pick the right option for each patient’s needs.

Formulations and Viscosities

Understanding the subtle yet significant differences between Restylane Contour and Lyft fillers is crucial for any medical professional engaged in facial aesthetic enhancements. 

Aspect	Restylane Contour	Restylane Lyft
Formulation	Designed for cheek augmentation, employing XpresHAn Technology™ for flexible movement and natural-looking results	The firmest Restylane formulation, ideal for lifting and contouring features with a more robust structure
Viscosity	Lower viscosity than Lyft, allowing for a smoother injection and subtle volume enhancement	High viscosity, providing significant lift and volume, particularly suitable for deeper injection sites
Intended Use	Primarily for cheek augmentation and midface contour corrections, emphasizing a more natural appearance	Used for both facial enhancement and the correction of age-related midface contour deficiencies, versatile in application, including under-eye hollows
Clinical Efficacy	Excels in creating a smooth, contoured appearance that moves naturally with facial expressions	It provides a pronounced lift and volume increase, making it suitable for more significant facial enhancements.

Restylane Contour, with its high viscosity and G-prime, is firm but can move smoothly under the skin. The fillers make it perfect for lifting cheeks without spreading too far from the injection site. Restylane Lyft has a different viscosity, allowing it to target deep wrinkles while still effectively lifting certain face areas. 

Intended Uses and Clinical Efficacy

Restylane Contour and Lyft serve different needs in making faces look younger or more shaped. They work well but in their ways, helping doctors pick the right one for each person’s face goals.

Restylane Contour aims to lift and add volume to the midface, making it ideal for cheek augmentation. It corrects shapes or volume differences in this area. Its hyaluronic acid formula provides a natural-looking boost, creating visible non-surgical facelift effects by addressing sagging or asymmetry in midface volume.

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Results

Transitioning from discussing the intended uses of Restylane Contour and Lyft for facial contouring, we now delve into the clinical efficacy and results that each filler has demonstrated. This comparison highlights the performance of these fillers in real-world applications.

Aspect	Restylane Contour	Restylane Lyft
Efficacy in Target Areas	Optimized for facial contouring and definition	Best suited for cheek augmentation and midface volume restoration
Clinical Results	Produces natural-looking enhancements	Delivers immediate volumizing effect, lasting improvement seen in 63% of nasolabial folds at 24 weeks
Injection Technique	Requires precise application to sculpt and define	The technique focuses on deeper layers for volume, supporting structural lift
Product Viscosity	Formulated for versatility in contouring without excessive swelling	Higher viscosity suitable for substantial volume addition
Use Cases	Enhancement of facial features with subtle, refined results	Correction of age-related volume loss with noticeable lift and fill
Study Findings		A multi-center study reported improved appearance in 63% of cases at 24 weeks post-treatment

Safety Profiles and Adverse Reactions

Restylane Contour impressing in a significant trial that measured its ability to enhance midface cheek contours up to 18 months. Safety profiles for Restylane Contour and Lyft are similar. Yet, it’s critical to understand their differences in potential adverse reactions: 

1. Swelling: Both fillers may cause swelling. However, the extent and duration can vary based on the injection site and filler used.
2. Redness: This common side effect appears with both fillers immediately after injection but tends to resolve faster in some patients, depending on the filler type.
3. Pain: Patients report pain during injection with both fillers. The experience might differ slightly due to each filler’s viscosity.
4. Bruising is a usual reaction, yet its frequency and severity might differ between Contour and Lyft because of their unique formulations.
5. Numbness: Certain areas might experience numbness post-injection, varying degrees from one filler to another.

Indications and Injection Techniques

Restylane Contour and Lyft fillers are great tools for facial contouring. They help doctors give people the look they want, but each has particular uses.

• Restylane Contour is ideal for cheek augmentation, sculpting, and enhancing midface regions, providing a defined look with precise work.
• Restylane Lyft adds natural-looking fullness to cheeks and the midface, enhancing facial features with balanced volume for an overall boost.
• Restylane Contour targets specific areas needing shape correction or a slight lift, which is perfect for sculpting without overdoing it, while Restylane Lyft restores lost fullness for comprehensive midface rejuvenation.
• Restylane Lyft excels in providing significant volume enhancement across larger areas, catering to varying volume correction needs.

Optimal Results with Each Filler

To get optimal outcomes with these fillers, follow these steps:

• Choose the Right Depth: Inject Restylane Contour into the mid to deep dermis layer and Lyft slightly above the bone for optimal results, considering variations in skin thickness across different facial areas.
• Apply the Correct Technique: Use linear threading for volume and definition, particularly for cheeks with Lyft, while fanning with Restylane Contour ensures even distribution for fine lines without overfilling.
• Adjust your Method: Enhance lips with dotting and linear threading for natural-looking fullness with Restylane Contour. Use controlled bolus injections with Lyft to lift sagging cheeks.
• Mind the Injection Angle: Employ a perpendicular angle for deep injections like those for Lyft in cheek augmentation. Use a more acute angle to evenly spread Restylane Contour in thinner skin areas around the eyes.
• Optimize Injection Speed: Maintain a slow and steady injection pace to prevent uneven results or excessive bruising, particularly with potent fillers like Lyft.

Considerations for Patient Anatomy and Desired Outcomes

Every face is unique. This truth makes it crucial to consider a person’s specific facial structure and what they want to achieve before picking Restylane Contour or Lyft. These choices directly affect how natural and satisfying the results will be. Understanding a patient’s lifestyle, budget, and how they see themselves plays a big part. 

Choosing the suitable filler—Restylane Contour or Lyft—depends on what you want to achieve with facial contouring. Due to its design, the Restylane for smile lines adds volume and shapes the midface.

Conclusion

Restylane Contour and Lyft serve different, specific needs in facial rejuvenation. Their distinctions in viscosity and application mean professionals can tailor treatments to patient goals.

The choice between Contour and Lyft impacts results when enhancing cheeks or smoothing deep wrinkles. Knowledge of each product ensures optimal outcomes for patients seeking a refreshed look.

About: DoctorMedica is your trusted supplier of top-quality dermal fillers, viscosupplements, and more for your medical practice. We offer genuine products from leading brands at the lowest prices in the market. If you’re looking to order Restylane online for your practice, the sales representatives at Doctor Medica can give you guidance.

FAQs

1. What’s the main difference between Restylane Contour and Lyft?

Restylane Contour is used for cheek enhancement, while Lyft is great for deeper lines and cheek lifting.

2. Can I use both Restylane Contour and Lyft together?

You can use both for different areas for a more complete facial rejuvenation.

3. How long do results from Restylane Contour last compared to Lyft?

Contour results can last up to 12 months, whereas Lyft might give you a good look for about 18 months.

4. Is one less painful than the other?

Nope, both treatments have similar discomfort levels, which are manageable.

5. Which one should I choose if I’m worried about looking natural?

Both can look natural when done by an experienced professional; it depends on what area of your face you’re focusing on.

References

Fundarò, S. P., Salti, G., Malgapo, D. M. H., & Innocenti, S. (2022). The Rheology and Physicochemical Characteristics of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Their Clinical Implications. International journal of molecular sciences, 23(18), 10518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810518

Braccini, F., Fanian, F., Garcia, P., Delmar, H., Loreto, F., Benadiba, L., Nadra, K., & Kestemont, P. (2023). Comparative clinical study for the efficacy and safety of two different hyaluronic acid-based fillers with Tri-Hyal versus Vycross technology: A long-term prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 22(2), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15200